Fig.1 OVA induced Balb/c mice asthma model. (A) Body weight (B) Body weight change. (*P<0.05, **P<0.01 Vs Group2)
Fig.2 OVA induced Balb/c mice asthma model. (A) Inflammatory cell number in BALF. (B) Eosinophils in BALF. (C) Eosinophils percentage in inflammatory cell. (D) Serum total IgE concentration.
Fig.3 OVA induced asthma model in BALB/c mice. (A) Lung H&E and PAS stain(B) Inflammatory cell infiltration score (C) Bronchial score.
Fig.1 Body weight of HDM induced hIL4/hIL4R mice asthma model (n=6, Data are presented as Mean and ± SEM).
Fig.2 HDM induced hIL4/hIL4R mice asthma model. (A) Inflammatory cell number in BALF. (B) Eosinophils in BALF. (C) Eosinophils percentage in inflammatory cell. (D) Serum total IgE concentration. (n=6, Data are presented as Mean and ± SEM.)
Fig.3 HDM induced hIL4/hIL4R mice asthma model. (A) hIL-4 mRNA expression level. (B) mIL-8 mRNA expression level. (C) mIL-13 mRNA expression level. (D) mIL-6 mRNA expression level. (E) mIL-17a mRNA expression level.
Fig.4 HDM induced hIL-4/hIL-4R mice asthma model. (A) Representative images of H&E staining. (B) Pathology score results. (n=6, Data are presented as Mean and ± SEM.) Magnification, ×5.
Fig.5 HDM induced hIL-4/hIL-4R mice asthma model. (A) Representative images of PAS staining. (B)mucus score. (n=6, Data are presented as Mean and ± SEM.) Magnification, ×10.
Fig1. HDM induced asthma in hTSLP/hTSLPR mice. (A) body weight (B) body weight change
Fig 2. HDM induced asthma in hTSLP/hTSLPR mice. (A) serum mIgE (B) serum HDM mIgE
Fig3. HDM induced asthma in hTSLP/hTSLPR mice. (A) BALF mCD45 events (B) BALF Eos events (C) BALF Eos%/mCD45
Fig4. HDM induced asthma in hTSLP/hTSLPR mice. (A) pathology score (B) Representative photographs of H&E and PAS -stained lung sections
Fig 1. Body weight monitoring in an HDM-induced asthma model using C57BL/6 mice. (A) Body weight over time. (B) Percentage change in body weight relative to baseline.
Fig 2. The efficacy of DEX on the HDM-induced asthma model in C57BL/6 mice. (A) Absolute number of eosinophils in BALF. (B) Percentage of eosinophils relative to total inflammatory cells. (C) Total serum IgE concentration.
Fig 1. Body weight monitoring in an HDM-induced asthma model using C57BL/6 mice. (A) Body weight over time. (B) Percentage change in body weight relative to baseline.
Fig 2. The efficacy of DEX on the HDM-induced asthma model in C57BL/6 mice. (A) Absolute number of eosinophils in BALF. (B) Percentage of eosinophils relative to total inflammatory cells. (C) Total serum IgE concentration.
Fig 1. Analysis of inflammatory cell populations in BALF. Flow cytometric quantification of inflammatory cells in BALF. (A) Percentage of macrophages. (B) Percentage of eosinophils. (C) Percentage of lymphocytes.
Fig 2. The efficacy Dupilumab and Tezepelumab on OVA+hTSLP-induced asthma model in hIL4/hIL4R/hTSLP/hCRLF2 mice. (A) Concentration of total serum IgE. (B) Concentration of OVA-specific serum IgE. (C) Relative mRNA expression of mCCL17 in lung tissue. (D) Relative mRNA expression of hIL-4 in lung tissue.
Fig 3. Comprehensive histopathological assessment of lung injury.
Fig 4. Comprehensive histopathological assessment of lung injury. (A) Inflammatory cell infiltration Score. (B) Eosinophil cell infiltration Score. (C) Bronchial Goblet Cell Hyperplasia Score. (D) Airway Basement Membrane Thickening Score. (E) Total Lung Injury Score. (F) PAS Staining Score.
